An Open Letter to Lindsay Lohan


Dear Lindsay,
You are at the crossroads of a defining moment. You are free to leave your gilded cage. Will you soar? Or will you splat against the window pane? Will your story be told as is Drew Barrymore's -- a story of triumph, accomplishment and esteem and (dare I say) joy? Or will your life story become an obituary about a life that might have been?

The choice is yours. Yes, Lindsay, how you author, direct and act in your life story from this moment on is entirely up to you.

Life happens for you, not to you. You -- yes YOU -- create the experiences in your life whether you realize it or not. This isn't about blame, shame, guilt or even credit. Those are judgment words and judgment is toxic to the human spirit. You did not get up out of bed on day wondering how you could screw up your life and then do just that. You, like everyone else, are doing the best you can with the light you have to see. And, Lindsay, some days you couldn't even find your flashlight lost at the bottom of your expensive trendy bag.

The light is there, I promise you. But it's not at a jewelry store. It's entirely within you. All you have to do is tap into it and light your way.

This is about taking full responsibility for the life you create. To do anything less, places you as a victim. And you most certainly were not born to be a victim to anyone or any thing.

Here's the thing…

If you created a s--- storm of life events you might as well go back and pick up the gifts you were meant to receive. I'm talking about the lessons you can learn that will positively change your life's direction, bring you more of the good stuff and less of the crap you've thrown upon yourself.

Here's the other thing…

You also created the highest of high moments in your life.You brilliantly used your innate gifts at their highest potential to experience sublime success. And, just as brilliantly, you began to throw it all away as if you weren't worth it somehow.

Now that's just babblecrap in the form of your own inner misguided thoughts and feelings. It's allowing yourself to be in service to other people's agendas instead of your own innermost calling and purpose in life.

Since you created your achievement you might as well go back and get the recipe of how to do it again. Examine how you showed up to achieve success and model that behavior. It's what you're here to do. I can't imagine being in jail, house arrest or the fodder for tabloid journalism is what feeds your soul.

Expressing your gifts is what will make your heart sing and give you the ability to fly freely, boldly and beautifully out of that gilded cage.

I'm rooting for you because I, like many people, love a story well told. ( thewrap.com )

READ MORE - An Open Letter to Lindsay Lohan

Lindsay Lohan Borrows $1,750 Gown, Hems it Herself, Returns it Totally Destroyed


Lindsay Lohan Borrows $1,750 Gown, Hems it Herself, Returns it Totally Destroyed - Lindsay Lohan Earlier this month, perpetually troubled starlet Lindsay Lohan made a pretty major red carpet appearance at the prestigious amfAR Gala, where she was decked out in a beaded gown by Theia. Given some of Lohan's regular fashion faux pas, we were fairly impressed with this ensemble. Apparently though, Lohan's dress didn't fare too well after the party was over.

According to Us Weekly, Lohan pulled some major strings to get the gown in the first place, having her dear friend (and occasional benefactor) Charlie Sheen call it in from noted stylist Phillip Bloch.


As the night progressed, Us reported that Lohan accidentally ripped the dress at an after-party and panicked, so she did what no other person in their right mind would ever do: She had her stylist friend run up to the bouncer, snag a pair of scissors, and hem it DIY-style.

"She turned it into a mullet! Only a fashiony person would do that! She's out of control and behaving really badly," a source told the mag. Frankly, we think a bad hem job is step up for the DUI-getting LiLo, but we can imagine the folks at Theia weren't too thrilled when their gown came back looking like this:


Same Theia Dress It's time for PR people to learn a very valuable lesson: Do not loan out a dress if Charlie Sheen and Lindsay Lohan are the team behind the pull request. End of story. ( StyleCaster )

READ MORE - Lindsay Lohan Borrows $1,750 Gown, Hems it Herself, Returns it Totally Destroyed

Lindsay Lohan Chewed to Pieces in Pitbull Lawsuit


Lindsay Lohan Chewed to Pieces in Pitbull Lawsuit - As it turns out, Lindsay Lohan doesn't have much luck as a plaintiff in legal proceedings either.

Troubled "Liz & Dick" actress Lohan, who has experienced more than her share of legal woes in recent years, was shot down Thursday in her lawsuit against Pitbull, Ne-Yo and Afrojack over the 2011 song "Give Me Everything."


Lindsay Lohan Chewed to Pieces in Pitbull Lawsuit

Lohan had sued the trio, along with others, under New York Civil Rights Law, claiming that the song made "disparaging and defamatory statements" about Lohan, violated her privacy, and used her name for advertising purposes without authorization.

Oh, and she also claimed that the tune caused her "tremendous emotional distress."

Specifically, Lohan took issue with the lyrics, "So, I'm tiptoein', to keep flowin'/I got it locked up like Lindsay Lohan."

However, Lohan's claims went down in flames in U.S. District Court in New York on Thursday, as Judge Denis R. Hurley granted the defendants' motion to dismiss and tossed out Lohan's complaint.

In his ruling, Hurley found that the song, as a protected work of art under the First Amendment, doesn't violate the New York Civil Rights Law.

The judge also dismissed Lohan's claim that the songwriters used her name for advertising or purposes or trade.

"Even if the Court were to conclude that plaintiff had sufficiently alleged that her name was used in the Song for purposes of advertising or trade, the isolated nature of the use of her name would, in and of itself, prove fatal to her New York Civil Rights Law claim," Hurley found.

As for the claim of emotional distress? Yeah, that didn't fly either, with Hurley ruling, "even if the defendants used plaintiff's name in one line of the Song without her consent, such conduct is insufficient to meet the threshold for extreme and outrageous conduct necessary to sustain a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress."

On the plus side for Lohan, the judge decided not to impose sanctions on the actress, as the defendants had requested.

In her complaint, Lohan asked for a permanent injunction preventing any further distribution of the song, plus an injunction ordering the defendants to surrender all existing copies of the song to Lohan.

Naturally, she was also asking for an accounting of the profits that the song had generated for the defendants to date, and "compensatory damages in an amount to be determined in the Court."

Looks like she's the one who hit a bum note, as far as the justice system is concerned. ( The Wrap )

READ MORE - Lindsay Lohan Chewed to Pieces in Pitbull Lawsuit

Tyson sues Live Nation, charging embezzlement and millions in lost earnings


Tyson sues Live Nation, charging embezzlement and millions in lost earnings - Mike Tyson is enjoying a career resurgence, a second (third?) chapter in his life in which the former heavyweight champion is proving to be far sharper and funnier than we'd given him credit for back during his boxing days.

He's reshaped his image with a memorable cameo in "The Hangover" (you can't hear "In The Air Tonight" without doing Tyson drums anymore, can you?), a one-man show ("The Undisputed Truth") and appearances on shows like "Law & Order." And now he's trying to address some of his financial matters. He's filed suit against SFX Financial Advisory Management Enterprises, a financial services firm owned by Live Nation, charging that one of its advisers embezzled more than $300,000 from him, as well as cost him millions in potential future earnings.
 
Mike Tyson today. (Getty Images)
 
Tyson's suit claims that SFX has not given Tyson a complete picture of the embezzled money, and while SFX has returned some of the money, has asked Tyson to sign a nondisclosure agreement. Tyson's suit seeks more than $5 million in damages for breach of fiduciary duty, negligent hiring, unjust enrichment and other charges.

"Defendants did not secure, protect, safeguard and appropriately apply the Tysons' finances for their intended purposes," the case states, "but instead misappropriated said funds for the benefit and enrichment of SFX/Live Nation."

According to Tyson, the embezzlement prevented him from getting out of bankruptcy and forced him to turn down potentially lucrative opportunities. The advisor, Brian Ourand, was a trusted confidante who attended Tyson's wedding; Ourand has since left the company.

The AP was unable to reach Ourand for a response. Live Nation Entertainment Inc. said it had not yet been served with the lawsuit and thus could not comment on it.

Tyson continues to remain active in public life, both as an endorser and a performer. ( yahoo.com )

Blog : Step Apart | Tyson sues Live Nation, charging embezzlement and millions in lost earnings

READ MORE - Tyson sues Live Nation, charging embezzlement and millions in lost earnings

Mike Tyson pummels live nation with $5 million lawsuit


Mike Tyson pummels live nation with $5 million lawsuit - Mike Tyson is used to squaring off against opponents in the ring. But the boxing legend is hoping to best his latest foe through the legal system.

Tyson and his wife Lakiha are suing events giant Live Nation and its subsidiary, SFX Financial Advisory Management Enterprises, claiming that the person that Live Nation appointed to look after their finances embezzled from them, causing them damages "in excess of $5,000,000."

 
Former heavyweight champion Mike Tyson walks on stage with his wife Lakiha Spicer …

According to the lawsuit, the Tysons signed on with SFX in 2005, as Iron Mike was attempting to settle a bankruptcy that was severely hampering his earning potential. (The complaint claims that the bankruptcy prevented the Tysons from earning more than $225,000 in "non-fight" income.)

Brian Ourand (also named as a defendant in the suit) was appointed to handle the Tysons' finances on behalf of SFX - but instead, the suit claims, he embezzled more than $300,000 from the couple.

The Tysons claim that Live Nation didn't inform them of the alleged theft until they asked why Ourand had been taken off of their account, and were later sent a legal document directly, rather than through their attorney, that would have waived the couple's right to file a lawsuit if signed.

A spokeswoman for Live Nation has not yet responded to The Wrap's request for comment.

The alleged $300,000 theft caused a ripple effect, the suit claims. The couple were forced to mortgage their home, and had to borrow money "to fund the IRS," the lawsuit - filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday - says.

According to the complaint, they were also deprived of "lucrative business opportunities" while the bankruptcy proceedings dragged on, and were "forced to enter into an onerous bankruptcy settlement."

"Defendant Ourand and Defendant SFX/Live Nation deceived the Tysons in the worst possible way at the worst possible time when the Tysons needed them to conclude Mr. Tyson's bankruptcy proceedings," the suit reads.

The suit alleges negligent hiring, retention and supervision; conversion; breach of fiduciary duty; fraud; and unjust enrichment.

Along with an accounting of " the funds stolen by Defendant Ourand," the suit is seeking economic and compensatory damages, along with punitive damages, court costs and attorneys' fees. (TheWrap.com)

Blog : Step Apart | Mike Tyson pummels live nation with $5 million lawsuit

READ MORE - Mike Tyson pummels live nation with $5 million lawsuit

REFILE-Reformer's drive to change Indonesia state firms hits roadblocks


REFILE-Reformer's drive to change Indonesia state firms hits roadblocks - On an overcast Saturday in early January, the man in charge of modernising Indonesia's state companies suddenly lost control of his prototype electric sports car and ploughed into the side of a mountain in East Java.
State-Owned Enterprises Minister Dahlan Iskan was unhurt, but the $300,000 bright red "Tucuxi", dubbed "Indonesia's Ferrari" by local media, was a write-off.

It looks like his chances of pulling off an ambitious reform of the bloated state sector are heading the same way.

More than a year after his appointment, most of Iskan's initiatives to fix state firms have either been revoked or blocked by parliament or remain stuck in ministries, according to government and parliamentary documents obtained by Reuters.

"The political challenge is still huge," said Iskan, who started his career as a journalist and still writes a regular column in his newspaper, in an interview. "Life is like that. It's difficult to make this country better."

Iskan has abandoned plans to start mass production of the privately funded Tucuxi, named after a type of dolphin.

But criticism over the crash -- he is being investigated by police for driving an unlicensed car on public roads, although no charges have been filed -- dented his reputation and further sapped his political capital, making it even tougher for him to battle powerful vested interests.

It is a frustration that, according to those close to him, is motivating the media mogul to consider standing as a candidate in next year's presidential election despite being viewed as a rank outsider.

"I would lie if I say I don't want to, I want to," Iskan said, when asked if he wanted the presidency.

He conceded he held only a small chance of winning, and declined to discuss his reasons for running because he was still a serving minister. But several people close to him said he saw the presidency as the only way to achieve change.

"Iskan is impatient over the lack of action just like any private sector guy. He's frustrated with the political pressure especially from the parliament," said a source close to Iskan who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue.

REFORM PRIORITY
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, two-thirds of the way through his second and final five-year term, has made reform of state companies a priority in developing the G20 economy.

Yudhoyono turned for help to Iskan, who made his reputation turning the near-bankrupt Jawa Pos Group into one of Indonesia's biggest media companies.

Just over a year since his appointment in late 2011, Iskan has struggled to implement any of his ambitious plans. On Jan. 23, he announced that he might have to cancel all his planned initial public offerings (IPOs).

It is not the first time Yudhoyono has picked a reformist and then failed to give them protection. His highly respected finance minister, Sri Mulyani Indrawati, became so exhausted by relentless politically motivated criticism she left in 2010.

Indonesia's 140 state-controlled firms account for a huge chunk of Southeast Asia's biggest economy -- their total revenues are estimated to have hit 1,500 trillion ($155 billion) last year, or nearly a fifth of gross domestic product.

Several of the companies have complete or near control of key industries such as energy, power and agriculture that underpin Southeast Asia's biggest economy.

"There is an ownership fetish -- the state wants to act as a entrepreneur," said James Castle, chairman of CastleAsia, one of Indonesia's leading consultancies for foreign firms.

"They are everywhere, acting like private companies, and they crowd out the private sector."

ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN

Even Iskan's attempt to take control of the appointment of senior state company managers has largely failed.

In November 2009, Yudhoyono, criticised over repeated power cuts, gave Iskan the job of heading state electricity monopoly PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) and agreed to allow him to choose his own board. The appointment was seen as a success.

As state-owned enterprises minister in 2011, he wanted similar freedom to make appointments free of political considerations. He discovered quickly that wasn't so easy.

Executives connected to political party chiefs and the presidential palace are on the board of more than half of the top 25 state firms, according to state-owned enterprises ministry data and the companies documents from 2012.

Two presidential decrees, issued in 2005 a year into Yudhoyono's first term, gave the authority to choose top managers of state firms to a "Final Assessment Team" (TPA) led by the president.

"These are, of course, assignments ... they are missions from the government," Firmanzah, a special advisor to the president with responsibility for administration and financial matters, said in defence of presidential staff appointments.

"This is to push for good governance."

ENEMY OF THE HOUSE


Iskan has also antagonised members of two parliamentary commissions with oversight of state companies.

"He is not an expert in bureaucracy, politics and lobbying. He's a businessman," said Muhammad Said Didu, chief commissioner of state planter PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV.

He faced a setback only a few months into the job when he was forced to revoke his first decree to give more flexibility to executives in state firms to take major business decisions.

Parliament warned Iskan the decree, which gave his ministry such powers as deciding share buy backs, was illegal.

"My questions are: Does he have the authority to do that? And is it in line with the state-firms law?" said Benny K. Harman, vice chairman of one of the parliamentary commissions overseeing state firms, who is from Yudhoyono's party.

Differences of interpretation and overlapping, sometimes conflicting, laws also hinder Iskan's attempts at major reform and can make executives afraid to act for fear of prosecution.

In 2012, he planned five state firm initial public offerings. Only one, builder PT Waskita Karya, went to the market and that had already been approved by parliament back in 2008, before he came into office.

Last month, he announced that all IPO and rights issue plans by state firms would probably be postponed because of technical and regulatory issues.

He declined to discuss a plan to create one of the world's largest palm-oil and rubber firms with $5.6 billion in assets, which had once been set for completion in March 2012.

"Changing the law in this country is like changing the Koran," senior Iskan aide Wahyu Hidayat told Reuters. "Next to impossible." ($1 = 9,680.5 rupiah) (Reuters)

READ MORE - REFILE-Reformer's drive to change Indonesia state firms hits roadblocks

A look at South Africa's justice system


A look at South Africa's justice system -- A look at the justice system in South Africa and what Oscar Pistorius faces after the double-amputee Olympic athlete was charged with premeditated murder in the Valentine's Day shooting death of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp:
---

THE BAIL HEARING
The bail hearing in the Pistorius case represents a mini-trial to determine if he will remain in custody until a trial or can be freed with conditions. Defense lawyers offered written statements from the athlete and his friends to state their case. By offering the affidavits, the defense was able to enter the evidence without having to put their emotional client, who has broken down weeping a number of times in court, on the stand. Prosecutors offered their own version of events and called the lead police investigator, Detective Warrant Officer Hilton Botha, to give testimony. But by putting Botha on the stand, they opened him up to detailed cross-examination by Pistorius' lead defense lawyer, Barry Roux. Botha has since been dropped from the case.

---

DECIDING BAIL
Pistorius faces the harshest bail requirements in South African law after the judge agreed with the prosecution's premeditated murder charge for the purposes of bail. Pistorius' lawyers must prove there is an ''exceptional'' reason to have him freed before trial. They also have to show that he doesn't represent a flight risk, that he will not intimidate witnesses and that he won't commit acts of violence or encourage others to do so. If Chief Magistrate Desmond Nair decides Pistorius might violate any of those terms, he can order him held until trial. If bail is denied, Pistorius can immediately appeal to a higher court. Pistorius is currently being held in Pretoria's Brooklyn police station, but those denied bail typically go to a prison.

---

JUSTICE IN SOUTH AFRICA
South Africa is one of just a few countries in the world that that has a court system that takes root in Roman-Dutch law. Because of this, those appearing in criminal trials do not have the option of a jury trial, which is common in the United States and other countries. Instead, a single judge will hear the entire case and then rule on a person's guilt or innocence. The judge can be assisted by two advisers during the trial. Those advisers generally offer assistance in looking at the more technical aspects of the evidence given at trial. If found guilty, a person can later appeal the ruling or the sentence they receive.

---

THE PENALTIES
Premeditated murder, which Pistorius is charged with, can carry a sentence of life in prison. There is no death penalty in South Africa. A lesser murder charge carries a sentence of 15 years to life. Pistorius could still see his charge downgraded to culpable homicide, meaning that he unintentionally killed Steenkamp, which is what he maintains. A conviction on that charge carries much less time in prison. ( The Associated Press )

Blog : Step Apart | A look at South Africa's justice system

READ MORE - A look at South Africa's justice system